Tag Archives: GM

News

GM’s “Shift to Park” Saga Finally Shifts Into Neutral — With a $500 Payout

After years of dashboard rage, glovebox paperwork, and the occasional swear word muttered in a dealership parking lot, General Motors’ infamous “Shift to Park” saga has finally found its gear — and it’s neutral.

Yes, that “Shift to Park” message. The one that refused to disappear no matter how many times you jiggled the shifter, pressed the button, or gave the console a stern talking-to. For thousands of GM drivers, it became a ritual of frustration — an electronic ghost light that simply refused to die.

Now, after enough legal back-and-forth to fill a soap opera season, The General has agreed to a settlement that’ll see affected owners walk away with a cool $500 (and maybe a bit of vindication). But as with most things involving lawyers, fine print, and Detroit, the story’s a little more complicated than that.

The Gears of Justice

The problem — or “Shift to Park” issue, as it’s politely known — haunted several GM models built between 2016 and 2019. Owners of vehicles like the GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Malibu, Traverse, Blazer, and Volt complained that their cars often refused to recognize when the transmission was in Park.

The result? A relentless warning message that prevented them from shutting off or locking the car. Nothing like a late-night driveway moment where your SUV insists it’s still in Drive.

Drivers grumbled, dealerships shrugged, and lawyers took notes. Eventually, lawsuits from Ohio and Tennessee merged into one, claiming that GM sold cars with defective gear selectors and failed to properly address the issue.

Now, after years of legal idling, a federal judge has approved a settlement. GM won’t admit fault — as carmakers rarely do — but the money’s real enough.

The Payoff

Here’s the deal:

If you bought or leased one of the affected models in Ohio or Tennessee and experienced the issue while the vehicle was still under warranty, you could get $500. Co-owners will have to share that, so maybe flip a coin for who gets the gas money.

If you paid for a repair yourself, GM will also reimburse up to $375 — assuming you have the paperwork and patience to prove it.

Leading the charge were plaintiffs Rilla Jefferson and Mark Riley, who each pocket $10,000 for their trouble. And in true courtroom tradition, the real winners might just be the lawyers — their cut totals a whopping $2.035 million.

Lessons From the Shift Gate

While the payout might seem modest, it’s a rare case where irritated drivers actually get something back for their grief. The “Shift to Park” saga underscores a modern automotive truth: the more we digitize, the more little gremlins can creep in.

A gear selector used to be a simple lever and a cable. Now it’s a networked node in a computer system that occasionally forgets how parking works.

GM’s not the only automaker to face tech-induced headaches, but this one struck a chord — because it wasn’t about performance or luxury or some optional extra. It was about turning your car off, the most basic function of all.

Final Shift

So, after years of stubborn warning chimes and dealership déjà vu, the “Shift to Park” story is winding down with a settlement, a check, and perhaps a collective sigh of relief.

It’s not a recall. It’s not a revolution. But for a few thousand GM owners, it’s at least an acknowledgment that — for once — the system really was stuck in the wrong gear.

And hey, $500 might not buy much these days, but it’s enough to fill the tank and take a long, well-deserved drive… just don’t forget to actually put it in Park this time.

Source: Automotive News

News

GM and Hyundai Seal Unexpected Alliance: Five New Vehicles and a Bold Strategic Vision

In an automotive world where strange alliances have become the norm rather than the exception, the announcement of a finalized partnership between General Motors and Hyundai still manages to raise eyebrows. While their initial Memorandum of Understanding last year flew somewhat under the radar, the now-official collaboration is anything but low-key — and it may shape the next decade of vehicle development across both hemispheres.

A Strategic Pivot for Two Industry Giants

Few would have predicted this tie-up between the Detroit powerhouse and South Korea’s Hyundai. Yet, as we’ve seen before — with Stellantis forming from the merger of PSA and FCA, or Bugatti joining forces with Croatian EV startup Rimac — unconventional bedfellows are reshaping the global automotive landscape.

The partnership between GM and Hyundai centers around the joint development and production of five new vehicles: compact and midsize pickup trucks, a compact SUV, and a similarly sized car for Central and South America, along with a pure-electric commercial van for North America. The combustion-powered and hybrid models will target emerging markets, while the U.S.-bound electric van will act as a smaller alternative to Chevrolet’s BrightDrop offering.

Division of Labor: Who Does What?

Hyundai will lead the development of the compact vehicles and electric van, with GM taking charge of the midsize truck. The companies will share platforms to optimize cost and development efficiency but aim to preserve distinct brand identities through unique exterior and interior design language. Each automaker will sell the vehicles under its own respective badge.

Once production reaches full capacity, the joint operations are projected to churn out over 800,000 vehicles annually.

Launch Timeline: 2028 and Beyond

While today’s announcement marks the public debut of the initiative, work has been underway behind closed doors for quite some time. The first models are expected to roll out in early 2028, starting with the North American EV van and closely followed by the Latin American offerings.

But this collaboration is more than just a product-sharing agreement. GM and Hyundai are also exploring joint procurement of raw materials, including low-carbon-emission steel, and are in discussions about a shared approach to hydrogen fuel cell technology — a notable divergence from Stellantis’ recent retreat from the hydrogen space.

Why This Matters

For both companies, the partnership is a tactical maneuver to reduce costs, shorten development cycles, and respond faster to market demands. In an era where EV mandates, carbon-neutral goals, and economic uncertainty are reshaping how cars are built, strategic alliances like this one are becoming increasingly essential.

And this is just the beginning.

Both companies have hinted that the current product roadmap is merely a starting point, suggesting more jointly developed vehicles could be on the horizon.

While a GM-Hyundai alliance may not have been on anyone’s 2024 bingo card, it now looks like a smart, forward-thinking play. In a market defined by rapid transformation, the ability to pivot, partner, and co-develop might just be the key to long-term relevance.

Stay tuned — this alliance could end up being one of the most consequential partnerships of the decade.

Source: Hyundai

News

GM Faces Legal Heat Over Faulty L87 V8 Engines

General Motors is facing growing scrutiny as a series of lawsuits and owner complaints converge around its L87 6.2-liter V8 engine—an optional powerhouse found in many of the automaker’s top-selling full-size trucks and SUVs. Alleged defects in the engine’s internal components are fueling frustration among owners, and the backlash is intensifying despite a broad recall earlier this year.

The latest class action lawsuit, filed in a Pennsylvania federal court, accuses GM of failing to adequately address a critical flaw in the L87 engine. Specifically, the suit alleges that a defect in the connecting rod or crankshaft can result in premature bearing failure—an issue that can lead to catastrophic engine damage, including full engine seizure or a rod breaching the engine block.

Affected vehicles span a wide array of GM’s premium and volume-selling models from the 2021 to 2024 model years, including the Cadillac Escalade and Escalade ESV, Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Suburban, and Tahoe, as well as the GMC Sierra 1500, Yukon, and Yukon XL.

A Recall That Raises More Questions Than It Answers

In January 2025, GM issued a recall affecting over 597,000 vehicles equipped with the L87 engine. The remedy varied by vehicle: while some were slated for full engine replacement, others were only given an oil change—switching to 0W-40 oil, a new oil filter, and an updated oil cap.

However, this fix has not quelled public or legal concern. Plaintiffs in the latest lawsuit, along with those in at least two other ongoing legal challenges, argue that the recall doesn’t go far enough. They claim the campaign offers an “inadequate and incomplete” remedy, failing to permanently resolve what they see as a serious safety and reliability issue.

Real-World Fallout

Among the plaintiffs is Farrah Forrest, who alleges her 2022 Cadillac Escalade experienced a major engine failure in late 2024. Although her vehicle’s engine was replaced under warranty, she reports that the repair process took three weeks—during which she was not provided with a loaner vehicle.

Interestingly, the two other named plaintiffs in the case, Mezanur Rahaman and Gerald Reed, haven’t experienced failures themselves but say they’ve lost confidence in the reliability of their vehicles and criticize GM’s response as lacking transparency and urgency.

A History of Complaints

While the lawsuit is new, GM has been aware of the issue for some time. An internal investigation reportedly unearthed more than 28,000 customer complaints or related incidents in the U.S. tied to the L87 engine. Despite this, the automaker closed the investigation in February 2022, and sales of vehicles equipped with the engine continued without interruption.

Moreover, L87 owners have reported a host of related performance issues, including abnormal shifting, reduced power, and hesitation during acceleration, suggesting that the defect may be symptomatic of broader drivetrain instability.

What’s Next for GM—and Its Customers?

GM has yet to publicly comment on the most recent legal action, but the growing list of lawsuits underscores a potential reputational risk for the brand, especially among buyers who prioritize reliability in the high-end SUV and truck market.

If courts find in favor of plaintiffs, GM may be forced to revise its recall strategy or provide broader compensation. Meanwhile, owners are left in a state of uncertainty—some waiting for failure, others wondering whether their engine is a ticking time bomb.

For GM, a brand that has heavily leaned into premium truck and SUV offerings in recent years, the stakes are high. The L87 engine was meant to symbolize performance and durability. Instead, it’s become the focal point of a legal and technical headache that shows no signs of going away.

Source: GM