News

Tesla Turns Its Cameras Into Predictive Crash Sensors

Leave a comment

Tesla has found yet another job for the cameras already covering its vehicles—and this time, the goal isn’t autonomous driving or parking assistance. Instead, the company’s latest software update turns those cameras into an extra set of eyes for the airbag system, allowing the car to begin preparing for an impact before it actually happens.

The new feature gives Tesla’s restraint system a valuable head start. According to the automaker, its camera-based crash prediction technology can trigger occupant protection systems, including seat belt pretensioners and airbag deployment logic, up to 70 milliseconds earlier than conventional systems alone. It may sound insignificant, but in a serious collision, fractions of a second can mean the difference between an airbag catching an occupant at exactly the right moment—or a split second too late.

Traditionally, airbags rely on accelerometers and crash sensors that only begin working once the vehicle has already made contact with another object. Those sensors must first detect the impact, calculate its severity, and determine whether airbag deployment is necessary before firing the inflators.

Tesla’s new approach flips that sequence on its head.

Using its forward-facing cameras, the vehicle can now identify the type of impending collision, estimate when contact is likely to occur, and predict how severe the impact will be—all before the physical crash sensors register anything. That advance warning allows the car to pre-condition its restraint systems so they’re ready the instant the collision occurs.

It’s a subtle but potentially meaningful evolution in automotive safety. While airbags appear to inflate instantaneously during crash-test footage, they actually require precious milliseconds to fully deploy. If deployment begins even slightly earlier, the airbags are more likely to be fully inflated by the time occupants move forward during the crash, maximizing their protective effect.

Importantly, Tesla isn’t replacing conventional crash sensors altogether. The cameras provide an additional predictive layer, but the final decision to deploy the airbags still comes from the vehicle’s traditional impact sensors. In other words, the system combines predictive vision with proven crash-detection hardware rather than relying solely on one technology.

The update builds on Tesla’s long-standing strategy of using cameras as the backbone of its vehicle technology. The same camera network already powers features ranging from Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capabilities to Tesla Vision, which replaced ultrasonic parking sensors on newer models. Adding predictive crash sensing further expands the role those cameras play in vehicle safety.

Tesla vehicles already rank among the safest cars tested by major crash-safety organizations, and the company clearly believes software can continue improving that reputation long after a vehicle leaves the factory. Better still, owners won’t need to buy a new car to benefit from the technology.

Tesla says the predictive airbag feature will roll out to existing vehicles through an over-the-air software update. However, the company has yet to specify which models or software versions will receive the new capability first.

Source: Tesla

Sale

Ferrari 328 GTS Conciso

Leave a comment

Some Ferraris are preserved. Others are restored. And a very small number are reimagined into something so left-field that even Maranello would probably do a double take. The latter is where the Michalak Design “Conciso” lands—an almost unrecognisable reinterpretation of a Ferrari 328 GTS that trades weight, complexity, and convention for a sharper, leaner kind of exoticism.

Built in the early 1990s by German design house Michalak Design, the Conciso started life as a standard 328 GTS before being stripped back and re-bodied into something closer to a design study than a traditional restomod. Ferrari itself had no involvement in the project. The mechanical backbone—the chassis and 3.2-litre V8 drivetrain of the original Ferrari 328 GTS—remains, but everything wrapped around it was re-engineered with one obsession in mind: mass reduction.

The result is a car that looks like a parallel-universe Ferrari. The proportions are familiar, but the surfaces are tighter, the bodywork more experimental, and the overall aesthetic far more industrial than sensual. It debuted publicly at the 1993 Frankfurt Motor Show, where it stood less as a Ferrari derivative and more as a design thesis on what happens when you aggressively strip a mid-engine sports car down to its essence.

Diet of Aluminium, Gains in Everything Else

The headline number is the weight. At just 1,900 pounds (889 kg), the Conciso sheds roughly 780 pounds (363 kg) compared to the standard Ferrari 328 GTS. That puts it not only well below its donor car but even beneath modern lightweight benchmarks like the Mazda MX-5.

That kind of reduction changes the character of the drivetrain entirely. With the same 3.2-litre V8 doing the work but far less mass to move, performance tightens up dramatically. The Conciso is said to reach 62 mph in around five seconds and continue on to roughly 170 mph (274 km/h)—numbers that push it closer to early-2000s supercar territory than late-’80s Ferrari grand touring.

It’s not about outright power. It never was. It’s about what happens when you remove everything that doesn’t absolutely need to be there.

A Collector’s Odyssey

After its Frankfurt debut, the Conciso entered a quieter, more nomadic phase. Michalak Design sold it to a North American collector, where it remained until 1998, before passing to a Belgian owner. In 2018, it returned to the United States, continuing its slow evolution from show car curiosity to bona fide collector oddity.

Between 2022 and 2023, the car underwent a comprehensive restoration by Italian specialists Bacchelli & Villa. More than €50,000 was spent returning it to its original specification, including a full respray in Rosso Corsa with Gunmetal Grey accents. The paintwork alone reportedly accounted for over €23,000—a reminder that when low-volume coachbuilt Ferraris are involved, even cosmetics operate in a different financial universe.

Now on the Market—Quietly

Today, the Conciso is being offered for sale in the United States through RM Sotheby’s Sealed platform, meaning no public price tag is attached. The last recorded auction result in 2018 placed it at $109,250, but given its rarity, restoration work, and renewed collector interest, that figure now feels more like a historical footnote than a benchmark.

RM Sotheby’s is keeping expectations discreet, which is fitting. Cars like this don’t really price themselves against standard Ferrari market logic. They exist in a narrower lane where design provenance, engineering curiosity, and sheer individuality matter as much as badge value.

The Conciso isn’t trying to be a better Ferrari 328 GTS. It’s trying to be a lighter, stranger, more focused interpretation of one. And in doing so, it has become something arguably rarer than performance alone: a Ferrari-based machine that feels genuinely unrepeatable.

In a market increasingly dominated by escalating horsepower wars and digital excess, the Conciso’s appeal is almost rebellious in its simplicity. Strip weight. Keep the engine. Redefine everything else.

Source: RM Sotheby’s

CONCEPT CARS

Shell Triple 10 Challenge

Leave a comment

Shell doesn’t usually show up in conversations about the future of passenger cars—at least not in the “here’s our next hot hatch” sense. But the oil giant has now stepped into concept-car territory with something it calls the Triple 10 Challenge, a compact electric vehicle study that reads less like a traditional product pitch and more like a manifesto for where EV efficiency might go next.

And like any good manifesto, it comes with three big, almost slogan-like targets: 10 km per kWh, less than 10 tonnes of lifetime CO₂e, and a 10-minute fast-charge window. In other words, Shell isn’t just trying to show an EV—it’s trying to compress the entire problem of electric mobility into three neatly measurable goals.

On paper, the numbers are eye-catching. The concept is said to recharge from 10 to 80 percent in just 9 minutes and 54 seconds, using a relatively ordinary 175 kW DC fast charger. That’s the kind of claim that usually triggers skepticism, but Shell’s emphasis here isn’t peak charging power—it’s thermal management. The company argues that the system can sustain high charging rates through a simplified cooling architecture that manages the entire powertrain’s heat load in one loop rather than several separate systems.

That’s where things start to sound less like a car reveal and more like a technology demonstration. At the center of it all is Shell’s new Recharge thermal fluid, a dielectric medium designed for direct immersion cooling of the battery pack and indirect cooling of motors and electronics. In theory, this approach reduces thermal bottlenecks that normally force EVs to taper charging speeds aggressively. Shell claims this enables faster charging, lighter system architecture, and improved efficiency across the board—using existing, scalable technologies rather than exotic breakthroughs.

The company also hints at a more tangible payoff: more than a 30 percent improvement in overall energy efficiency compared with many current-generation EVs, alongside a roughly 25 percent reduction in battery pack cost. Those gains are attributed not to a single silver bullet, but to a combination of simplified module design, reduced packaging complexity, and the thermal fluid system doing more of the heavy lifting.

On the environmental side, Shell frames the Triple 10 as a lifecycle exercise as much as a vehicle concept. Lightweight construction, optimized battery sizing, recyclable materials, and charging powered entirely by renewable energy are all part of the equation. The result, according to Shell, is up to a 50 percent reduction in lifecycle emissions compared with typical battery EVs sold in Europe today.

The hardware behind the idea is being handled by a network of specialists rather than a traditional OEM. Electric drive development is credited to Empel Systems, while battery integration work is handled by RML Group. Shell itself is, unsurprisingly, focused on the fluids and thermal systems that underpin the whole concept.

Visually, the Triple 10 leans toward the familiar end of the EV design spectrum, even if it’s not tied to production reality. It’s described as a compact five-door hatchback with a tall stance, a full-width light bar, flush door handles, and digital side mirrors. There’s also an aerodynamic wheel design with what appears to be a stylized “aluminum-look” finish, plus a minimalist interior featuring a rotary-style selector. Nothing here screams production intent—but everything feels deliberately plausible.

And that’s really the point. The Triple 10 Challenge isn’t trying to preview a Shell-badged showroom car. It’s trying to prove a systems argument: that if you rethink thermal management and simplify architecture, you can move the needle on charging speed, efficiency, cost, and emissions all at once.

Whether that translates cleanly into the messy reality of mass production is another question entirely. But as concept cars go, this one isn’t about horsepower or styling theatrics. It’s about whether the plumbing underneath an EV might matter just as much as the battery inside it.

Source: Shell

Cars and catalogues