Tag Archives: New cars

Why Every New Car in Europe Is Watching the Driver—Not Recording Them

If you’ve been shopping for a new car lately, you’ve probably noticed that modern vehicles are becoming increasingly interested in what you’re doing—not just what’s happening on the road. Lane-centering, adaptive cruise control, and emergency braking have already transformed the driving experience. Now, another piece of technology is quietly becoming mandatory across Europe, and it has sparked no shortage of debate.

Starting July 7, 2026, every new passenger car sold in the European Union must be equipped with an Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW) system. The name may sound bureaucratic, but its mission is straightforward: make sure the person behind the wheel is actually paying attention.

Predictably, the internet has been flooded with claims that Brussels now requires cars to film every journey and send footage to government databases. The reality, however, is considerably less dramatic.

Your Car Is Watching—But It Isn’t Building a Surveillance Archive

The ADDW system relies on a small camera mounted near the rearview mirror, on the A-pillar, or at the top of the dashboard. Rather than monitoring the road ahead, its job is to monitor the driver.

Using computer vision, the system evaluates where you’re looking, how your head is positioned, and how your eyes move. If it determines you’ve been distracted for too long—whether you’re staring at your phone, searching for something in the center console, or simply daydreaming—it reminds you to refocus on the road.

The timing depends on speed.

At city speeds between 20 and 50 km/h (12–31 mph), the system waits until the driver has looked away for approximately six seconds before issuing a warning.

Above 50 km/h (31 mph), that threshold shrinks dramatically to around 3.5 seconds, reflecting the greater risk associated with higher-speed travel.

Importantly, the software understands that not every glance away from the windshield is dangerous. Looking at the instrument cluster, checking essential controls, or briefly glancing toward the passenger side are all considered normal driving behavior and won’t automatically trigger an alert.

No, It Isn’t Recording Every Trip

The biggest misconception surrounding the new regulation is that European cars are about to become rolling surveillance cameras.

Under the technical rules governing ADDW, that’s simply not how the system works.

The camera continuously analyzes the driver’s attention in real time, but it does not create a permanent video recording. Any temporary image data is constantly overwritten, meaning there is no growing archive of your daily commute. The system also does not record audio.

Perhaps more importantly, the regulation explicitly forbids the technology from identifying who is sitting behind the wheel.

Unlike facial-recognition systems used in smartphones or airports, ADDW isn’t allowed to collect biometric information capable of identifying a specific person. The software only determines whether the driver appears attentive—not who that driver is.

All processing happens locally inside the vehicle. The information isn’t transmitted to the automaker, government agencies, or cloud servers as part of normal operation.

Privacy Questions Aren’t Going Away

That doesn’t mean concerns are entirely unfounded.

Privacy advocates often point out that software can evolve over time, and regulations can change. While today’s rules specifically prohibit driver identification and external data sharing, no technology is completely immune from future legislative or software changes.

Still, under the regulations taking effect in 2026, ADDW is designed strictly as a driver-assistance feature—not a monitoring network.

In other words, your car is checking whether you’re watching the road, not creating a replay of your weekend road trip.

Mandatory for New Cars—Not Existing Ones

Drivers of older vehicles can breathe easy.

The new requirement only applies to new passenger cars sold in the European Union from July 7, 2026.

Manufacturers have already been fitting ADDW to newly introduced vehicle models since July 2024, but the latest phase extends the requirement to every new vehicle entering the market, regardless of when that model was originally developed.

Cars already registered remain unaffected. There is no requirement to retrofit existing vehicles with driver-monitoring cameras.

You Can Turn It Off—Sort Of

European lawmakers also recognized that not every driver wants constant reminders to keep their eyes forward.

Manufacturers are therefore required to allow drivers to deactivate the warning system—or at least silence its alerts.

There’s one catch.

Like many modern safety features, ADDW automatically reactivates every time the vehicle is restarted. If the camera is blocked or malfunctions, the vehicle must notify the driver with a dashboard warning indicating that the system isn’t operating correctly.

Another Step Toward Vision Zero

Driver distraction monitoring doesn’t exist in isolation. It’s part of a broader package of mandatory safety technologies now appearing in virtually every new European vehicle.

Reverse assistance systems, lane-keeping assistance, intelligent speed assistance, event data recorders—often described as automotive “black boxes”—and several other advanced driver-assistance systems are all pieces of the same strategy.

The European Union’s long-term objective is ambitious: reducing road fatalities to zero by 2050.

Whether ADDW becomes another quietly accepted safety feature—like ABS or electronic stability control—or remains a controversial symbol of increasing digital oversight will likely depend on how unobtrusively manufacturers implement it.

For now, the message from Europe’s regulators is clear: future cars aren’t just getting better at watching the road—they’re also making sure you are too.

Infotainment Frustration: What New Car Buyers Hate Most in 2025

For more than a decade, automakers have been pushing futuristic interior designs. But a new J.D. Power Initial Quality Study for 2025 suggests that this strategy could have negative long-term consequences.

According to the report, infotainment systems are now the number one source of complaints among new car owners, eclipsing all other categories in the first 90 days of ownership. While the overall number of tech-related grievances has seen a slight dip compared to last year, touchscreen-centric designs continue to frustrate drivers—particularly when basic functions like climate control are buried beneath multiple layers of digital menus.

“While customers find larger touchscreens visually appealing, their functionality within the vehicle is a growing source of frustration,” says Frank Hanley, senior director of automotive benchmarking at J.D. Power. “Customers have to tap and swipe across multiple screens to access key vehicle functions like climate settings and built-in garage door openers.”

Hanley adds that returning to physical buttons for essential tasks could significantly enhance the user experience—a sentiment echoed by many owners who say their dashboards now feel more like tablets than control centers.

This rise in digital frustration comes at a time when manufacturers are pouring resources into creating increasingly tech-heavy cabins. While minimalist interiors might impress in a showroom, the reality of day-to-day driving—adjusting the A/C while navigating traffic—reveals a different story. In some cases, what was intended to be an elegant solution has become an ergonomic problem.

And it’s not just touchscreens under scrutiny. Surprisingly, cup holders have entered the chat.

J.D. Power reports a spike in complaints related to cup holder design. With reusable water bottles, thermoses, and oddly-shaped tumblers now the norm, many drivers are finding their vehicle’s cup holders haven’t kept up. What seems like a minor annoyance becomes a real issue when a $50 water bottle topples over every time you take a turn.

The Initial Quality Study is based on feedback from 92,694 new-car owners and lessees in the U.S., recorded within the first 90 days of ownership. Brands are ranked by the number of problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score indicating higher perceived quality. However, the study does not measure the severity of issues—meaning a rattling trim panel counts the same as a powertrain failure—and it doesn’t reflect long-term reliability.

Top Performers and Surprise Contenders

For 2025, Lexus leads the pack with a score of 166 PP100, followed by Nissan (169) and Hyundai (173). One of the most surprising results came from Jaguar, which finished fourth (175), outperforming brands typically associated with rock-solid reliability. Chevrolet rounds out the top five at 178, despite slipping three places from last year.

On the other end of the spectrum, Rivian ranked lowest with a score of 274. Audi (269) and Volvo (254) also found themselves near the bottom, despite their premium positioning. Tesla, while improved from last year, still came in below average at 200 PP100. Meanwhile, Ram experienced a dramatic drop from last year’s top spot, falling to a middling 218.

Model Highlights and Powertrain Pitfalls

General Motors had a strong showing in individual vehicle rankings, with the Buick Encore GX, Cadillac XT5, and Chevrolet Tahoe, Blazer, and Silverado all topping their respective segments. Ford followed closely with four segment leaders, while Honda secured three wins.

Powertrain-wise, plug-in hybrids performed to be the most problematic category, scoring a worrisome 237 PP100—worse even than full battery-electric vehicles, which scored 212. Regular hybrids were somewhat better at 196, but still fell short of traditional gasoline-powered vehicles, which averaged just 184.

New model introductions also showed a higher incidence of problems (203 PP100) compared to carryover models (190), highlighting the industry’s ongoing challenge in refining new designs and tech before they hit the market.

What This Means for the Future

As automakers race toward an increasingly digitized future, the J.D. Power study serves as a timely reminder that technology must serve the driver—not the other way around. While big screens and minimalist cabins may look great on the showroom floor, the real test lies in daily usability.

Function still matters. And for many drivers, reaching for a physical button may be more satisfying—and less frustrating—than swiping through another digital menu.

Source: J.D. Power

Gallery: