Category Archives: News

News

Alpine’s Supercar Dreams Are Real—Just Not Ready Yet

When Alpine rolled the Alpenglow concept onto the stand at the 2022 Paris Motor Show, it felt like one of those moments—headphones out, conversation stopped, phones raised. This was Alpine, the brand best known for featherweight sports cars and rally-bred attitude, suddenly flirting with hypercar theater. Then, in 2024, Alpine doubled down with the Alpenglow Hy4, a fully functional hydrogen-powered prototype. Naturally, the internet jumped to the obvious conclusion: production Alpine supercar incoming.

Not so fast.

According to Alpine CEO Philippe Krief, the idea is very much alive—but deliberately parked a few corners down the road. And if anyone knows what it takes to bring a halo car to life, it’s Krief. Before taking the reins at Alpine, he cut his teeth at Ferrari, working on cars like the 458 Speciale—the swan song of the naturally aspirated mid-engine V-8—and the 296 GTB, Ferrari’s pivot into V-6 hybrid territory. He understands both the romance and the reality of supercars.

“The purpose of a supercar is to build awareness for a brand, explore new technologies that can feed back into the brand, and make some money,” Krief said at the launch of Alpine’s new A390 coupe-SUV in Spain. That last part—making money—is where things get complicated.

Krief is refreshingly honest about the challenges. Could Alpine build a supercar with its relatively small team? Yes. Could it make money doing so right now? Probably not. The engineering might be achievable, but the surrounding ecosystem—sales, service, customer experience—is just as critical, especially when buyers are dropping Ferrari money and expecting Ferrari-level treatment.

That’s where the Alpenglow fits in. For now, it’s a rolling manifesto rather than a pre-production promise. Alpine will continue to use it as a communications tool and, more importantly, as a laboratory for new ideas. Before taking the “last step” into a full-fledged supercar, Krief wants Alpine to grow as a brand and ensure it can deliver the kind of end-to-end experience supercar customers take for granted.

Still, don’t mistake patience for hesitation. The Alpenglow is already shaping Alpine’s future—just not in the way you might expect.

Look closely at the brand’s upcoming road cars and the influence is obvious. The next-generation electric A110 and the forthcoming A310 coupe and convertible will borrow heavily from the concept’s design language, especially up front. The sharp V-shaped nose and intricate lighting signatures have already begun filtering into production metal, most notably on the A390.

Underneath, Alpine’s future rides on the Alpine Performance Platform (APP), a modular, lightweight architecture designed to underpin the brand’s next wave of sports cars. While Alpine’s immediate focus is electric, APP is flexible enough to support hybrid powertrains—and Krief’s background suggests that capability isn’t accidental.

Back in May 2025, Krief tipped his hand on what a future Alpine halo car might look like mechanically. A pure EV? Not likely. Instead, he favors a hybrid setup centered around a V-6 engine. Not a plug-in hybrid, but something lighter and more focused—hybridized for performance rather than efficiency. More power without betraying Alpine’s core philosophy.

That philosophy becomes even clearer when Krief talks inspiration. Rather than chasing a modern Ferrari 296 head-on, his dream points backward. Way backward.

“My dream is rather a modern Alpine interpretation of the Dino,” he said—referencing Ferrari’s compact, lightweight V-6 sports car from the late ’60s and early ’70s. Not a fire-breathing hypercar, but a balanced, driver-focused machine. Less about headline horsepower, more about feel. In other words, very Alpine.

For now, no final decisions have been locked in. Alpine has a packed four-year product roadmap to get through, and Krief is careful not to overpromise. But one idea clearly excites him: using the APP platform to do “extreme things.” That means limited-run, high-impact models that go beyond styling exercises and deliver genuine engineering substance.

Think along the lines of the A110 R Ultime, launched in 2024 with a staggering £267,000 price tag. Financially, that car already lives in supercar territory. Philosophically, it serves as a template—low volume, high ambition, and designed to elevate the entire brand rather than simply pad a balance sheet.

“A halo model for Alpine is a model for the whole organisation,” Krief explained. The goal isn’t to sell tens of thousands of units. It’s to push technology, raise execution standards, and create a new benchmark for what Alpine can deliver—while quietly boosting the appeal of its more attainable models.

And yes, profitability still matters. Krief has seen it done at the highest level, and he knows it’s possible to build exotic cars that both market a brand and make money. But timing, as he stresses, is everything.

So if you’re waiting for an Alpine supercar to take on Ferrari and McLaren tomorrow, keep waiting. But if you’re watching a brand carefully lay the groundwork for something lighter, sharper, and unmistakably Alpine, pay attention. The dream is real. Alpine just wants to make sure it gets it right.

Source: Alpine

News

Bring Back the Box: Why the MPV Deserves a 2026 Comeback

Does your washing machine come with a raised ride height? Would you pay extra for a storage unit with a rakish roofline? Do your Amazon parcels arrive sporting flared wheel arches and a “sport” trim badge? Of course not. When it comes to moving people and stuff, the truth is stubbornly simple: boxy works. Always has.

And yet, family-car buyers in the UK—and pretty much everywhere else—have collectively decided that what they really need is an SUV. A tall one. A chunky one. Preferably with fake skid plates and wheels that look like they were borrowed from a Tonka truck. In making that choice, they’ve traded space efficiency and real-world practicality for something they believe looks fashionable. Whether SUVs are still “cool” when literally everyone, including your grandmother and her bridge club, drives one is very much up for debate.

What’s beyond debate is what we lost along the way.

The Multi-Purpose Vehicle—long the unsung hero of family transport—has been pushed to the margins. Once-familiar names like Zafira, Galaxy, Picasso, and Voyager have quietly slipped into history. Even the Renault Scenic, for years the poster child of sensible European family motoring, has shape-shifted into an SUV. If you want a new MPV today, your options are mostly limited to vans with windows and seats bolted in.

To be fair, modern van-based people movers are far better than their ancestors. They’re refined, surprisingly decent to drive, and massively practical. But no matter how plush the seats or how clever the infotainment, there’s still a lingering school-minibus vibe you can’t quite shake.

Which is why a recent six-month stint with Volkswagen’s ID. Buzz felt like a reminder from the past—and maybe a postcard from the future. Yes, there’s a Cargo version, but crucially the Buzz is based on a passenger-car EV platform, not a commercial vehicle shell. And it proves something MPV fans have known all along: if your goal is to fit people and their belongings inside a vehicle, nothing beats a purpose-built box on wheels.

The Buzz isn’t perfect, and it isn’t cheap, but its basic philosophy is spot-on. Upright sides. A tall roof that’s actually usable. Seating that works with the laws of physics instead of against them. You don’t climb up into it or fall down out of it—you just get in. What a concept.

Encouragingly, there are signs that manufacturers might be rediscovering this forgotten logic. Kia has rolled out the PV5. Lexus sells the ultra-luxurious LM. Volvo has the EM90. In China, premium MPVs like the Zeekr Mix and Denza D9 are thriving, quietly proving there’s real demand for vehicles that prioritize space, comfort, and flexibility over aggressive styling cues. Mercedes is also lining up the VLE, another signal that the segment isn’t as dead as it once appeared.

The catch? Most of these are large, expensive, or aimed at markets outside the UK. But shrink those ideas down. Make them affordable. Pitch them as mid-size family cars rather than luxury lounges. Do that, and it’s not hard to imagine serious sales volume.

Which brings us to a modest proposal: 2026 should be the year of the MPV revival.

Not the dowdy, beige boxes of old, but modern, intelligently designed people movers that lean into what they do best. Cars with genuinely flexible seating systems, sliding doors that make school runs painless, clever storage solutions, and interiors that can morph from family shuttle to DIY hauler in minutes. Wrap it all in clean, understated styling, and suddenly “practical” doesn’t have to mean “boring.”

SUVs, after all, have become the cane toads of the automotive ecosystem. They evolved an early advantage—buyers liked the look, manufacturers liked the margins—and promptly multiplied until they crowded out nearly everything else. Now the market is awash with big faces, bluff noses, and vehicles that promise adventure but rarely venture beyond a speed bump.

The MPV can be the antidote. It’s more useful than an SUV unless you genuinely go off-road. It’s more honest about its mission. And unlike SUVs, it isn’t burdened with awkward questions about efficiency penalties, unnecessary weight, or why you need all-wheel drive to do the weekly shop.

Most of all, more MPVs would bring something the family-car market sorely lacks: choice. Real choice. Not just the same tall hatchback in slightly different outfits.

While we’re at it, let’s also bring back a few estates. But that’s a crusade for another day.

For now, the message is simple. The box was never the problem. We just forgot how good it was.

Source: Auto Express

News

Arizona Wants to Let the Fast Cars Run Free—At Least in the Daytime

Speed limits are a compromise. Not between physics and machinery, but between the best drivers and the worst ones sharing the same ribbon of asphalt. They’re written for the distracted, the hesitant, and the underprepared—not for the person in a well-sorted car on a clear road with both hands on the wheel and eyes far ahead.

Arizona lawmakers are flirting with the idea of acknowledging that reality.

State Rep. Nick Kupper has introduced a proposal that would remove daytime speed limits on select stretches of rural interstate, effectively creating American autobahn zones where “reasonable and prudent” driving replaces a posted maximum. If it passes, Arizona could become the boldest U.S. state yet to admit that not all highways—and not all drivers—are created equal.

The bill, officially titled the Reasonable and Prudent Interstate Driving (RAPID) Act (HB 2059), would allow the Arizona Department of Transportation to designate limited sections of rural interstate as derestricted speed zones. No blanket free-for-all here: the plan applies only outside urbanized areas with populations over 50,000 and only during daylight hours. Once the sun goes down, an 80-mph cap snaps back into place.

Before anyone imagines ADOT tossing out speed limit signs on a whim, there’s a long checklist attached. Any eligible highway segment would have to pass engineering and traffic studies, meet high-speed roadway design standards, and show a crash rate below the statewide average over the last five years. In other words, the road has to earn the right to go limit-free.

There’s also an important asterisk: commercial vehicles don’t get to play. Trucks and other commercial traffic would remain bound by the standard 80-mph limit or lower, regardless of time or location.

Kupper points to Montana as precedent. From 1995 to 1999, the state famously removed daytime speed limits on rural highways, relying instead on a “reasonable and prudent” standard. While average speeds did rise, a later legislative audit found that crash and fatality rates per vehicle mile traveled continued to decline and stayed consistent with neighboring states.

The lesson, according to that study, wasn’t about the numbers printed on signs. It was about behavior. Seatbelt use, attentiveness, and overall driving habits mattered more than posted limits. In short, the human factor outweighed the speedometer reading.

“Most drivers can tell the difference between a crowded city freeway and a wide-open stretch of rural interstate,” Kupper argues. “The RAPID Act accounts for that difference.”

For enthusiasts, the appeal is obvious. Modern cars—especially performance sedans and grand tourers—are engineered to cruise comfortably and safely at speeds that would’ve seemed outrageous a generation ago. On the right road, in the right conditions, the limiting factor often isn’t the machine but the law.

HB 2059 will be formally taken up once Arizona’s 2026 legislative session begins. Whether it survives the political and public-safety gauntlet remains to be seen. But the proposal itself is notable: a rare moment when lawmakers are willing to question whether one-size-fits-all speed limits still make sense on wide-open, modern interstates.

If nothing else, Arizona is asking a question few states dare to ask anymore—what if the road, the car, and the driver actually matter more than the sign?

Source: AZ Free News