China Just Slammed the Door on Fancy EV Handles

It finally happened. After years of flush-mounted, motorized, and frankly over-engineered door handles taking over the EV world, China has decided it’s had enough.

Beginning January 1, 2027, every electric vehicle sold in China will be required to have old-fashioned, mechanical door handles—inside and out. No motors. No pop-out theatrics. No “wait for the handle to present itself” UX experiments. Just something you can grab and pull when things go wrong.

And things have gone very wrong.

The move comes after a string of high-profile, fatal EV crashes in which doors were allegedly impossible to open because the vehicles had lost electrical power. Two particularly horrific Xiaomi EV accidents, in which occupants and would-be rescuers reportedly couldn’t open the doors before fire overtook the cars, turned public outrage into regulatory action.

China’s message is clear: if the power goes out, the doors still need to open. Period.

Not Just a Ban—A Design Rewrite

This isn’t some vague safety guideline. According to Bloomberg, China’s new rules read like a door-handle engineer’s fever dream.

Exterior handles must include a physical handhold measuring at least 60 mm by 20 mm—big enough for a rescuer’s gloved hand to find and yank after a crash. Inside, emergency door releases must be clearly labeled with signage at least 1 cm by 0.7 cm, positioned in standardized locations.

And here’s the killer: automakers are no longer allowed to rely on electronically powered handles at all—even if they include backup batteries or mechanical pull cables. If it needs electricity to work, it’s out.

That wipes out a massive chunk of the EV design playbook. Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y? Affected. BMW’s upcoming China-market iX3? Yep. Nio, Li Auto, Xpeng, Xiaomi—all built their brand identities partly around the sleek, hidden-handle aesthetic that China just declared unsafe.

As recently as April, about 60 percent of China’s top-selling new-energy vehicles used concealed or power-presented door handles. That entire trend now has a 2027 expiration date.

This Will Cost Automakers Real Money

Redesigning a door handle isn’t just swapping out a piece of trim. These systems are baked into crash structures, wiring looms, door skins, water seals, and interior panels.

A source familiar with Chinese EV development told Bloomberg that retrofitting a model to comply with the new rules could cost as much as 100 million yuan—about $14.4 million—per vehicle line. Multiply that across dozens of models, and suddenly door handles are a nine-figure problem.

Some brands saw this coming. Geely and BYD have already started creeping back toward traditional exposed handles, and Tesla’s design chief admitted months ago that the company was preparing for a regulatory pivot.

But here’s the twist: China’s EV-only rule is going to affect far more than just China.

Why This Won’t Stay in China

Automakers hate building region-specific hardware. It’s expensive, messy, and kills economies of scale. If China—the world’s largest EV market—requires mechanical door handles, most global automakers will simply standardize on compliant designs everywhere.

That means the end of pop-out handles may not be limited to Beijing or Shanghai. It could quietly kill the trend worldwide.

And that’s not just speculation. Tesla is already under formal investigation in the U.S. over its door systems, and European regulators have begun exploring their own restrictions. Once one major regulator draws a hard line, others tend to follow.

China may have just fired the opening shot in a global design rollback.

The Weird Part: Gas Cars Get a Free Pass

Here’s where things get awkward.

The ban applies only to electric vehicles—even though most EV door handles run on the same 12-volt electrical systems used in gas cars. In other words, the thing China says is dangerous on an EV is apparently fine on an SUV with a V-8.

Case in point: the Infiniti QX80 already uses electrically powered, pop-out door handles. If its battery were knocked out in a crash, it could fail in exactly the same way as the EVs now being regulated.

So yes, the law is inconsistent. But it still sets a powerful precedent: regulators are no longer willing to let “cool” design trump basic mechanical fail-safes.

The End of the Flush-Handle Era?

For a decade, electronic door handles were the visual shorthand of the modern EV—clean, aerodynamic, and vaguely futuristic. They also turned out to be a liability when everything else goes wrong.

China just decided that doors exist for emergencies, not Instagram.

And once the world’s largest EV market says something is unsafe, it rarely stays optional for long.

If you love pop-out handles, enjoy them while you can. The industry just got a very loud reminder that sometimes the best technology is the one that still works when the lights go out.

Source: Bloomberg

Porsche Chooses Tobias Sühlmann to Shape Its Future

For more than 20 years, Porsche’s look has been guided by one steady hand. From the evolution of the 911’s timeless silhouette to the once-controversial but now indispensable Panamera, Michael Mauer didn’t just design cars—he defined what modern Porsche means. But starting February 1, 2026, that responsibility will pass to a new generation, as Tobias Sühlmann steps in as Porsche’s new Head of Design.

Sühlmann, 46, arrives from McLaren, where he’s been Chief Design Officer since 2023, and his résumé reads like a greatest-hits album of modern performance brands: Volkswagen, Bugatti, Aston Martin, Bentley, and now Porsche. If there’s a common thread in that lineup, it’s high-speed elegance—and that’s exactly what Stuttgart is betting on as it navigates an electrified, software-driven future.

The End of the Mauer Era

Michael Mauer, now 63, leaves behind one of the most influential design legacies in Porsche history. Since taking the job in 2004, he’s been the caretaker of one of the most recognizable shapes in the automotive world: the 911. Under his leadership, Porsche modernized without losing its soul, a balancing act that many legacy brands have fumbled.

Mauer also helped Porsche expand its design language beyond sports cars. The Panamera, launched in 2009, was a gamble—a four-door Porsche sounded like heresy at the time—but it became a cornerstone of the brand. Then came the 918 Spyder, which proved that electrification could coexist with exotic performance long before hybrids were cool.

More recently, Mauer led Porsche into the EV era, making sure the Taycan and future electric models still look unmistakably Porsche. His philosophy was simple but demanding: a Porsche should appeal to all the senses, not just the stopwatch.

And he’s not disappearing overnight. Mauer will stay on during a transition period, ensuring that Porsche’s design DNA doesn’t get lost in the handoff.

Enter Tobias Sühlmann

If Porsche wanted a safe, conservative pick, Sühlmann wouldn’t be it—and that’s the point.

He, like Mauer, studied at the legendary Pforzheim University of Applied Sciences, but his career has taken him through some of the most daring design studios in the industry. From shaping Bugatti hypercars to refining Aston Martin’s elegance and helping craft Bentley’s ultra-exclusive Batur, Sühlmann has spent his career where luxury, performance, and bold styling collide.

His most recent stint at McLaren is especially telling. Woking isn’t known for nostalgia—it’s about aerodynamic aggression and futuristic surfaces. That influence could push Porsche’s design language into sharper, more expressive territory without abandoning its iconic roots.

Porsche CEO Michael Leiters has made it clear what he expects: Sühlmann is there to “sharpen Porsche’s profile.” In other words, this isn’t about reinvention—it’s about turning up the contrast.

What This Means for Future Porsches

This leadership change comes at a critical moment. Porsche is preparing for a future where electrification is the rule, not the exception. The next-generation 718 will be electric. More battery-powered models are coming. And design will have to do more than ever to preserve emotional appeal when engine noise fades away.

Sühlmann’s background in high-end sports and supercars makes him uniquely suited to that challenge. Expect Porsches that look more sculpted, more aggressive, and perhaps more experimental—especially as new EV platforms free designers from traditional packaging constraints.

But don’t expect the 911 to suddenly forget who it is. Porsche is famously cautious with its icons, and Mauer’s continued involvement during the transition will ensure continuity. The headlights will still look like Porsche headlights. The roofline will still whisper “911.” The soul will still be there.

A Generational Shift, Not a Revolution

Porsche isn’t ripping up its design rulebook—it’s passing it to a new author.

Michael Mauer wrote one of the longest and most successful chapters in the brand’s history, guiding Porsche through SUVs, sedans, hybrids, and EVs without losing its visual identity. Tobias Sühlmann now gets to write the next one, armed with experience from some of the world’s most exciting performance brands.

For Porsche fans, that’s not something to fear. It’s something to watch closely.

Source: Porsche

Maserati Blocks Sale of First Customer MCXtrema After Bidding Hits $751K

For a company that’s spent the last decade searching for relevance, Maserati doesn’t get many moments of genuine buzz. The MCXtrema should have been one of them. A track-only, 730-horsepower evolution of the MC20, limited to just 62 units worldwide, the MCXtrema is exactly the kind of unhinged halo car that makes enthusiasts lean in and start paying attention again. Instead, Maserati has found a way to turn that excitement into confusion, frustration, and a canceled auction.

Late last month, the first customer-owned MCXtrema ever to hit the open market appeared on Bring a Trailer. The car was essentially new, showing just 228 kilometers (141 miles), and had been delivered to its original owner during 2024’s Monterey Car Week. Not long after, it landed in the hands of a dealer—almost certainly with resale profits in mind.

Bidding quickly surged to $751,000. Then, just as quickly, the entire listing vanished.

The reason? Maserati didn’t like it.

Bring a Trailer confirmed that Maserati of North America intervened and restricted the sale of the car, forcing the auction to be withdrawn. No official explanation was offered as to why Maserati would block the resale of a vehicle that had already changed hands once.

“We obviously cannot put the eventual winning bidder into a problematic post-auction situation,” BaT wrote, adding that the seller was informed Maserati was restricting the transaction. Translation: the manufacturer made it clear the buyer might not be able to register, service, or even properly take ownership of the car if the auction continued.

That’s not how you want your million-dollar track toy introduced to the world.

Unsurprisingly, the enthusiast community didn’t take it quietly. On BaT’s forums, reactions ranged from annoyed to outright mocking. One user summed up the mood perfectly: “For the first time in years, there’s finally some excitement around a new Maserati… and Maserati of North America finds yet another way to mess it up.” Another commenter was less subtle, suggesting Maserati should instead focus on stopping its normal cars from depreciating “like used Kleenex.”

The irony is that the MCXtrema is exactly the kind of machine Maserati should be celebrating in public view. Beneath its wild aero and track-only bodywork sits the familiar MC20 architecture—but turned up to a near-ridiculous level. The twin-turbo 3.0-liter V-6 has been cranked to 730 horsepower, channeled through a six-speed sequential gearbox and a mechanical limited-slip differential driving the rear wheels. It’s lighter, louder, more aggressive, and entirely unconcerned with things like emissions, ride comfort, or road legality.

In other words, it’s everything modern Maseratis usually aren’t.

Manufacturers trying to control who buys their ultra-rare cars isn’t new—Ferrari has made a sport of it—but blocking a resale after a car has already been delivered sets a different, far more awkward precedent. If Maserati wants the MCXtrema to be taken seriously as a hardcore driver’s machine rather than just another rich-guy toy, it probably shouldn’t treat its first public resale like a scandal.

The MCXtrema was supposed to signal that Maserati still knows how to build something wild. Instead, it’s also becoming a reminder that even when the hardware is finally right, the brand can still trip over its own shoelaces.

Source: Bring a Trailer

Cars and catalogues