Tag Archives: EVs

Kia Walks a Tightrope in Europe’s Shifting Auto Market

Selling cars in Europe today is no longer just about satisfying consumer demand—it’s about navigating a complex web of regulatory requirements, economic pressures, and shifting market preferences. And no automaker illustrates this balancing act better than Kia.

Despite the European Union’s aggressive push toward electrification, combustion-engine vehicles still dominate the roads. According to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), electric vehicles (EVs) accounted for just 15.3% of new car sales in the EU during the first four months of the year. Yet the regulatory noose is tightening: the EU is pressing ahead with stricter CO₂ emissions limits and has mandated that all new cars sold from 2035 onward must be electric.

Caught in this tug-of-war is Kia, which is carefully trying to strike the right balance. “If we rely too much on combustion cars, we risk not reaching the CO₂ targets and having to pay fines. If we push EV sales too much, we end up denting our profit margins,” said Carlos Lahoz, Vice President of Sales for Kia Europe, in an interview with Automotive News Europe.

The dilemma isn’t unique to Kia. Across the continent, automakers are grappling with a similar paradox. Traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still more profitable and in higher demand, but EVs are essential to meet emissions targets and avoid hefty fines. Volkswagen and Renault have both voiced fears that failing to comply with new EU emissions standards could cost them billions of euros as early as 2025.

The EU has somewhat eased the pressure by allowing carmakers to average their emissions over the 2025–2027 period rather than hitting targets in 2025 alone. Still, the road ahead is steep. Stellantis’ chairman recently revealed that over a quarter of engineers’ working hours are now consumed by regulatory compliance tasks, much of it related to emissions standards.

At the heart of the problem is a lack of profitability in the EV sector. Lahoz acknowledged that battery costs remain a major hurdle, preventing electric vehicles from achieving cost parity with their gas-powered counterparts. As a result, Kia must use profits from ICE models to fund the transition to electric—a strategy echoed by many automakers across Europe.

Nonetheless, Kia is proving that strategic flexibility can pay off. The South Korean brand is enjoying a strong year in Europe, capturing a 4.1% market share in the EU, EFTA, and UK combined during the first four months of 2025. That puts it ahead of several well-established rivals, including Ford (3.4%), Opel/Vauxhall (2.9%), Citroën (2.8%), Fiat (2.3%), and SEAT (1.7%). Impressively, it even surpassed its larger affiliate Hyundai (3.9%).

For now, Kia’s strategy hinges on maintaining a careful equilibrium: continuing to sell ICE vehicles to support short-term profitability, while steadily growing its EV lineup to ensure long-term survival in an increasingly green automotive landscape. Whether that tightrope walk can remain sustainable as regulations tighten and competition from low-cost EV manufacturers, particularly from China, intensifies remains to be seen.

But one thing is clear—Europe’s automotive future is electric, and Kia, like the rest of the industry, must evolve without stumbling.

Source: Automotive News Europe

Ferrari Faces Reality Check as Demand for Electric Supercars Fades

In a surprising but telling turn of events, Ferrari is hitting the brakes on its electric future—at least temporarily. While the legendary Italian marque is preparing to launch its first-ever electric vehicle in 2026, the model will be a limited-edition, symbolic milestone rather than a true entry into the mass market. The real test—Ferrari’s second and first mass-produced electric model—has reportedly been delayed until at least 2028, and may even be scrapped entirely.

According to a Reuters report citing anonymous sources within the company, the reason is blunt: there’s virtually no demand for an electric Ferrari.

This news reflects a broader stagnation in the electric vehicle (EV) market, especially in the high-end performance sector. While electric cars have steadily gained traction in urban and commuter segments, the allure hasn’t translated to the world of exotic sports cars. Customers who spend hundreds of thousands on brands like Ferrari or Lamborghini still crave the visceral roar of combustion engines—something electric drivetrains struggle to replicate.

Ferrari, like fellow EV-hopefuls Rimac and Maserati, is learning this the hard way. Despite the technological promise of instant torque and lightning-fast acceleration, electric supercars appear to be a solution in search of a problem that buyers don’t think exists.

Ferrari’s first electric model, due in 2026, will remain a collector’s piece—limited in number and intended more as a brand milestone than a commercial breakthrough. The follow-up model, originally expected by late 2026 or 2027, was planned as a full-production vehicle. But with projected sales of 5,000 to 6,000 units over five years now looking wildly optimistic, the project has been quietly pushed back to 2028.

However, the delay does come with a potential silver lining. Ferrari now has more time to refine its EV technologies. The company has already filed patents for a “virtual engine and transmission system” designed to simulate the auditory and tactile experience of a traditional Ferrari. This mirrors a similar innovation from Hyundai in its critically acclaimed Ioniq 5 N, which uses artificial gear shifts and synthetic sound to enhance driver engagement.

Still, the road ahead is uncertain. Ferrari isn’t alone in rethinking its electric ambitions. Lamborghini recently pushed back its first EV launch from 2028 to 2029, and Maserati has reportedly shelved its electric MC20 altogether.

These delays suggest a hard truth: the emotional connection that fuels the supercar market doesn’t plug in as easily as the cars themselves. As EVs evolve, performance may no longer be the ultimate differentiator—but in the world of Italian exotica, passion and experience still reign supreme.

Whether Ferrari can eventually bridge that gap remains to be seen. For now, it’s clear that Maranello is in no rush to replace the roar of a V12 with the whisper of electrons.

Source: Reuters

Trump’s Fossil Fuel Favor: California’s EV Future on the Line

New resolutions nullify California’s landmark rule to abolish the sale of new combustion engine cars in the next 10 years, sparking a fresh legal and political battle over environmental authority and the future of the auto industry.

The move reverses a Biden-era policy that had approved California’s right, under the federal Clean Air Act, to set stricter emissions standards than the federal government. Trump, calling the state’s plan a “disaster,” argued it would “effectively abolish the internal combustion engine, which most people prefer.”

The resolutions also revoke two additional California policies: a mandate for half of all new trucks sold in the state to be electric by 2035, and a regulation to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions, a contributor to smog and respiratory illness.

At the White House event, attended by Republican lawmakers and fossil fuel executives, Trump signaled a broader protectionist turn by threatening to raise auto tariffs above the current 25%, citing the need to encourage domestic manufacturing.

California responded swiftly. Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state agencies to find alternative ways to promote electric vehicles and reward automakers that commit to phasing out gasoline cars. State Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the resolutions, backed by ten other states.

“This is a completely improper use of the Congressional Review Act,” Bonta said, arguing that it applies to regulations—not to EPA waivers that have allowed California to lead on air quality for over 50 years.

With 40 million residents and enormous market influence, California’s clean car standards were set to shape nationwide manufacturing. Automakers face uncertainty as they weigh compliance in states aligned with California’s goals.

Republicans praised the reversal, calling California’s mandates unrealistic. But Newsom warned the move “destroys our clean air and America’s global competitiveness.”

As legal challenges mount, the clash highlights a central question: Who controls America’s climate policy—federal regulators or states on the frontlines of pollution and innovation?

Source: New York Times