Tag Archives: ADAC

ADAC Reveals Stark Fuel Price Disparities on German Autobahn

German drivers are facing steep fuel prices on the nation’s autobahns, according to a recent study by the German Automobile Club (ADAC). The analysis, conducted across 50 motorway service stations and 50 nearby alternatives, highlights a glaring discrepancy that can cost motorists over €20 per tank.

On average, drivers pay 43.7 euro cents more per liter for Super E10 and 42.5 euro cents more for diesel when refueling at motorway service stations. With a standard 50-liter tank, that translates to savings of €22 for petrol and just over €21 for diesel—simply by exiting the highway.

One of the most striking price differences was recorded at the Hochfelln-Nord station on the A8 Salzburg–Munich route, where Super E10 was priced 57 cents higher than at a station in nearby Übersee—only three kilometers away. Similarly, on the A3 between Frankfurt and Cologne, the Limburg Ost station charged nearly 54 cents more per liter of diesel than a nearby outlet just two kilometers from the motorway exit.

These are not isolated anomalies. The study found that 90% of motorway fuel stations charged at least 30 cents more per liter of Super E10, and 88% did the same for diesel. In fact, nearly a quarter of stations charged a markup of 50 cents or more.

However, there are exceptions. The Fuchsberg Nord station on the A20 in Mecklenburg had a modest 5.9-cent difference for Super E10 and an almost negligible 0.9-cent gap for diesel compared to the nearby station in Neukloster. But such cases remain rare.

What’s particularly alarming is that these price gaps have widened over time. In 2024, the average difference stood at just over 39 cents for Super E10 and 38 cents for diesel—figures that have climbed notably this year.

While the ADAC acknowledges that motorway stations face higher operational costs—due to long operating hours and expensive land concessions—the organization criticizes the excessive markups as unjustifiable.

“Such massive differences go beyond reasonable surcharges,” an ADAC spokesperson commented. “We advise drivers—whether in cars or on motorcycles—to plan ahead and refuel at stations located off the motorways. The cost savings are significant and consistent.”

With fuel prices climbing and wallets tightening, motorists would be wise to heed ADAC‘s advice. The autobahn might offer speed, but when it comes to filling up, the smarter route is often the scenic one—just off the next exit.

Source: ADAC

ADAC Puts All-Season Tires to the Test: Only Half Make the Grade

As winters across Europe become increasingly mild, more drivers are turning to all-season tires as a convenient and cost-saving alternative to switching between summer and winter sets. With just one set of tires needed year-round, drivers save both time and money — especially in moderate climates. But are all-season tires really up to the challenge?

Germany’s leading automobile club, ADAC, has released its latest test results on 16 all-season tires in the widely used 225/45 R17 size, a common dimension for vehicles in the lower mid-size segment. The findings are mixed: while some tire models performed impressively, others failed to meet basic safety standards.

Top Performers Show Progress

The test brought encouraging news: four tire models earned a “good” rating, a marked improvement from the previous year’s results. This indicates that manufacturers are responding to the growing demand with better technology and quality.

Topping the rankings are the Goodyear Vector 4-Seasons Gen-3 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2, both achieving an ADAC rating of 2.3 (with 1 being best). The Continental stood out as the only tire to receive a “good” overall rating in driving safety, while the Goodyear impressed with its projected durability — lasting up to 68,000 kilometers, the highest in the test.

Close behind are the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3 and Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, each scoring 2.5. These four lead the pack, offering strong performance across dry, wet, snowy, and icy conditions.

Middle Tier Offers Decent Options

The next group includes products from Michelin, Dunlop, BF Goodrich, and Viking. While not as strong as the top-tier models, these tires received satisfactory ratings and are considered safe choices by the ADAC.

Poor Performers Raise Safety Concerns

However, not all results were reassuring. Half of the tested tires received only “adequate” or worse ratings, with four models showing serious deficiencies. At the bottom of the list are the Arivo Carlorful A/S and the Petlas Multi Action PT565, both scoring a dismal 5.5. These tires failed to perform adequately on any surface and exhibited significant weaknesses in at least one key category.

The differences between models were stark. On wet roads, for example, the Continental tire came to a full stop from 80 km/h in just 31.3 meters. In contrast, the Arivo Carlorful A/S required 11.3 meters more — a critical difference in real-world driving.

ADAC: Consider Your Driving Needs

While all-season tires are increasingly viable for everyday drivers in mild regions, the ADAC emphasizes that they are not a one-size-fits-all solution. Drivers planning long summer trips with heavy loads, or winter journeys into snowy mountain regions, are still better off using dedicated summer and winter tires for optimal performance and safety.

The message is clear: not all all-season tires are created equal. For those considering the switch, careful selection is key — and consulting trusted tests like ADAC’s can make all the difference.

Source: ADAC

Gallery:

13 of 80 EVs suitable for long-distance driving

The largest European automobile association, ADAC, tested more than 80 electric vehicles and showed that only 13 of them are suitable for long-distance driving.

ADAC first tested vehicles with a range of over 750 kilometers. The best results were achieved by the Hyundai Ioniq 6 with a 77.4 kWh battery and rear-wheel drive, and a range of 931 kilometers with one stop and an additional short charge. The Lucid Air achieved the second best test with 859 kilometers, the BMW iX traveled 835 kilometers, the Mercedes EQS achieved a range of 825 kilometers, the EQE SUV achieved a range of 806 kilometers and the Polestar 2 traveled 801 kilometers.

After that, vehicles with a range between 500 and 750 kilometers were tested (42). These vehicles are considered to be suitable for long distances or vehicles suitable for long distances with a slightly longer charging time.

Also, 14 vehicles with a range of 400-500 km were tested, and vehicles with a range of less than 400 km, such as the Fiat 500e with a 23.8 kWh battery, which had a range of 233 kilometers despite additional charging.

The measurement was carried out with the battery charged to 90 percent, which is the case in most situations, because drivers usually go on the road with a deviation of up to 10 percent. The test also included the additional autonomy that can be achieved after charging on a fast charger during a 20-minute break in ideal conditions.

In conclusion, when purchasing an EV, buyers should pay attention to battery size, power consumption, and charging time.

Source: ADAC, Photo: Authors’ Union Mobility/ADAC/Ralph Wagner