Between 1999 and 2009, Honda produced over 110,000 units of the open top sports car, the Honda S2000. It is a modern classic that still sells for a lot of money, and one example, a 2000 Honda S2000, recently sold for $95,000.
This Honda S2000 is in excellent condition and has only 42 miles (67 kilometers). Considering that the car has been driven very little in the past 25 years, it is no surprise that it has been perfectly preserved. It is finished in Silverstone metallic over a black interior. What makes this model special is that unlike most Honda cars, it has rear-wheel drive.
The previous owner was a buyer from New York, and it is not known who the new owner of this car is. The car was estimated at $60,000 – $80,000, but the new owner paid much more.
The Honda S2000 is powered by a 2.0-L DOHC inline-4 engine with 240 hp @ 8300 rpm and 153 lb-ft @ 7500 rpm, mated to a 6-speed manual transmission.
In late 2024, Nissan and Honda signed a memorandum of understanding to discuss a merger of the two companies, but the merger appears unlikely to happen. There are many reasons why the story of merging these two companies was started, and one of them is the protection of domestic manufacturers from foreign takeovers. Some believe Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) pushed the merger to stop rumors of a takeover of Nissan by Taiwanese technology company Foxconn. Now the Taiwanese company has said it is open to talks with Nissan.
Foxconn’s electric vehicle business is led by former Nissan CEO Jun Seki, who was once seen as a candidate to become the automaker’s CEO before the job went to current boss Uchida.
Nissan has said it is open to cooperation with Taiwan’s Foxconn, the world’s largest contract electronics manufacturer, although the Japanese manufacturer has previously ruled out talks with the Taiwanese company. Foxconn, which makes Apple products, was looking to expand its electric vehicle manufacturing business and saw Nissan as a partner.
Nissan had hoped to merge with Honda to become the world’s third-largest automaker, but talks have been complicated by growing differences and Honda’s push to turn Nissan into a subsidiary, Reuters reported.
Great pressure, primarily from Chinese companies that are rapidly taking control of the largest markets, calls into question the future of many manufacturers, including Nissan. They badly need a partner, and have already announced plans to lay off 9,000 workers and cut 20 percent of their global capacity.
Not so long ago, information appeared that Nissan and Honda will join forces and create one of the largest automotive groups. However, the latest information calls the project into question because both companies are not sure what the merger would bring to them.
Honda is in a relatively good position when it comes to hybrid vehicles, but it does not show big ambitions in the EV segment. On the other hand, Nissan has the problem of an outdated electric model range, poor finances and management problems, while its advantages are a better production network, especially in Southeast Asia, and the Sakura model, which is achieving outstanding results in the domestic market. Honda’s partnership with GM collapsed after the bad start of the Prologue model, while its first independently developed long-range EV will not reach the market before 2026.
Those who know the situation at both companies better believe that their strengths could help both companies. However, there are also those who do not believe in this project. Automotive analyst Julie Boote of Pelham Smithers Associates says: “Honda needs to partner with another company to step up its efforts on electric vehicles and software-defined vehicles because it is a mid-sized automaker. Ideally, it would be a healthy and financially sound company, not Nissan.”
There are many reasons why the story of merging these two companies was started, and one of them is the protection of domestic manufacturers from foreign takeovers. Some believe Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) pushed the merger to stop rumors of a takeover of Nissan by Taiwanese technology company Foxconn. Former Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn was also against it, saying: “It means you are putting control over performance. Personally, I don’t think it will be successful.”
Even if a merger happens, the entire process could be completed in about six months, while the first effects could be seen in three to five years, which is simply too long for the auto industry.
