Tag Archives: Tesla

News

Tesla Semi Enters Full Production at Last

By the time Tesla’s Semi rolls into full production this year, it will have taken one of the longest victory laps in modern automotive history. Nearly ten years after Elon Musk first pulled the wraps off the futuristic electric big rig in 2017, Tesla now says the Semi is finally ready for true mass production and customer deliveries. And, for the first time, we have a clear picture of what the production-spec truck actually is.

The short version? It’s big, it’s powerful, it’s very fast to charge—and it’s probably not going to be cheap.

Two Trucks, One Mission: Kill Diesel

Tesla will sell the Semi in two flavors: Standard Range and Long Range. Both are rated for a gross combined vehicle weight of 37.2 tons (about 82,000 pounds), meaning they’re designed to haul a full-size trailer without excuses. Underneath, both versions use a tri-motor drivetrain producing 800 kW, or 1072 horsepower—a figure that would have sounded absurd in trucking a decade ago, but now sits at the heart of Tesla’s diesel-disrupting pitch.

The Standard Range Semi is rated for 523 km (325 miles) on a full load. The tractor itself weighs about 9 tons, leaving room for a 28-ton payload, and Tesla claims an energy consumption of 1.7 kWh per mile—an impressively low number for something that can tow a small apartment building down the highway.

Step up to the Long Range Semi and the range jumps to 805 km (500 miles). Tesla still won’t officially say how big the battery is, but at the same consumption rate, it works out to roughly 900 kWh—which is about 13 times the capacity of a Model Y. The tradeoff is weight: the tractor grows to 10.5 tons, cutting payload to 26.7 tons. For long-haul operators, though, that extra range will likely be worth the hit.

Megawatts, Not Kilowatts

The Semi’s other headline feature is charging. Both versions use the Megawatt Charging System (MCS 3.2), allowing peak charging power of up to 1.2 megawatts. That’s not a typo. Tesla says the battery can go from empty to 60 percent in just 30 minutes, roughly the length of a mandated driver break. In theory, that makes the Semi viable for real-world freight cycles, not just short shuttle routes.

Tesla has also built in an electric power take-off (ePTO) system delivering up to 25 kW, letting the truck run refrigerated trailers, hydraulic systems, or other auxiliary equipment without firing up a diesel generator. It’s a small detail that matters a lot in commercial use.

The Slow Road to Production

This isn’t Tesla’s first time building Semis. Limited production started back in late 2022, with early trucks going to PepsiCo, followed by smaller fleets at Walmart and DHL Supply Chain. Those pilot programs were essentially rolling test beds, feeding data back to Tesla while the company ironed out the last production wrinkles.

Now Tesla says it’s ready to scale up, turning what was once a flashy prototype into an actual product you can order.

The Price Nobody Wants to Talk About

And that brings us to the elephant in the loading dock: price.

Tesla is staying silent, but history gives us some clues. Back in 2017, Musk promised a $150,000 price for a roughly 300-mile Semi and $180,000 for the 500-mile version. Those numbers look downright quaint in 2026, given inflation, battery costs, and the simple fact that the Long Range Semi now packs a battery larger than most houses.

One indirect hint came from Ryder, which quietly cut its Semi order from 42 trucks to 18 while keeping the total budget at $7.5 million. Do the math and you’re looking at something north of $400,000 per truck—a far cry from the original promise.

Even with sticker shock, the Tesla Semi is shaping up to be one of the most important EVs on the road. With over 1000 horsepower, megawatt-level charging, and real-world range numbers that make long-haul electrification plausible, it’s no longer just a Silicon Valley science project.

After almost a decade of waiting, Tesla’s electric big rig is finally ready to do what it was always meant to do: take on diesel where it actually counts—on the open road, hauling real cargo, for real customers.

Source: Tesla

News

Tesla’s Most Ironic Supercharger Yet

By any normal definition of irony, a Tesla Supercharger powered by diesel generators should not exist in 2026. And yet here we are, standing in the snowy Swedish mountain town of Vansbro, watching electric cars quietly refill their batteries from a bank of lithium cells that were, moments earlier, topped up by the gentle clatter of combustion engines. Welcome to the strangest Tesla charging station ever built.

For years, photos of EVs plugged into diesel generators have floated around the internet, usually as relics of the awkward early days of electrification or as gotcha memes aimed at climate-conscious drivers. Tesla’s new Supercharger in the Dalarna region is something else entirely: a deliberately engineered, semi-off-grid, diesel-fed charging outpost, installed not because it made sense—but because Tesla had no other choice.

A Supercharger by force, not by cable

Vansbro sits on the road to some of Sweden’s most popular winter tourist destinations, the kind of place where range anxiety becomes real when temperatures drop and mountain passes loom ahead. Tesla wanted a Supercharger here as a last safe haven before drivers head into the highlands. Normally, that would mean connecting a few cabinets to the local electrical grid and calling it a day.

But Tesla isn’t operating under normal circumstances in Sweden.

For nearly two years, the company has been locked in a bitter standoff with IF Metall, Sweden’s powerful metalworkers’ union. Tesla refuses to sign collective bargaining agreements for its service and sales employees, insisting on individual contracts instead. That position puts Tesla alone among major employers in Sweden, a country where collective agreements are the bedrock of labor relations. While Tesla has accepted such arrangements elsewhere in Europe, it has dug in its heels here—and triggered a uniquely Scandinavian response.

The quiet power of organized refusal

Under Swedish law, unions are allowed to support one another through so-called solidarity actions. In practice, that has turned Tesla’s Swedish operations into a game of corporate whack-a-mole.

Postal workers stopped delivering license plates for Tesla vehicles. Tesla tried to bypass them by sending lawyers to request the plates, only for the postal service to recognize and block those requests as well. Eventually, Tesla employees resorted to having plates sent to their private homes and even to the addresses of relatives, a logistical workaround that felt more like espionage than car sales.

Then came the electricians. Unionized electrical workers refused to connect new Tesla Superchargers to the grid. That was already causing headaches last winter, slowing Tesla’s network expansion across the country. Vansbro, it seems, was the point where Tesla decided to stop asking and start improvising.

Battery buffers and diesel backup

Since the Supercharger couldn’t get a permit to hook into the grid, Tesla installed a large on-site battery pack instead—essentially a miniature power plant. The chargers draw energy from that battery, just as they would from the grid. The only problem? Batteries don’t make electricity. They just store it.

So Tesla parked diesel generators next to them.

When the station’s batteries run low, the generators automatically kick in, charging the battery bank. That energy then flows, via the usual sleek white Supercharger posts, into Model Ys, Model 3s, and the occasional Cybertruck on winter holiday duty. From the driver’s seat, nothing looks unusual. Behind the scenes, however, electrons are being born in a very un-Tesla way.

It’s a technological Rube Goldberg machine: diesel fuel to generator, generator to battery, battery to car. Efficient? Not particularly. Effective? Apparently yes.

The green asterisk

Tesla is keenly aware of how bad this looks. To soften the optics, the company points out that the generators run on HVO—hydrotreated vegetable oil. Chemically similar to diesel, HVO is produced from plant-based raw materials and waste fats. Because the plants used to make it absorb CO₂ as they grow, the lifecycle emissions are theoretically lower than those of fossil diesel.

That may be true on paper, but the sight of generators humming away beside a Supercharger still feels like something from an Onion headline.

Tesla insists the Vansbro station is only a seasonal installation, designed to handle the winter tourist rush. The generators, it says, are a temporary measure until a proper grid connection can be arranged. When—or if—that happens will depend less on engineering and more on labor politics.

A very 2026 kind of contradiction

The Vansbro Supercharger isn’t just a quirky footnote in EV history. It’s a reminder that the clean-energy transition doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It runs through labor laws, social contracts, and sometimes through diesel engines parked in the snow.

In an era when electric cars are supposed to represent a clean break from the past, Tesla’s Swedish outpost feels like a surreal compromise with it. You plug in, you charge, you drive away emissions-free—never mind the generators quietly working in the background, burning fuel so your car doesn’t have to.

Only in 2026 could the future of electric mobility depend on a tank of vegetable-based diesel in the mountains of Sweden. And only Tesla could turn a labor dispute into a Supercharger that runs on irony as much as electricity.

Source: Tesla

News

Tesla Is Dumping Its Flagship Cars to Build Robots Instead

By any reasonable measure, the Tesla Model S and Model X are among the most important cars of the 21st century. The Model S proved that electric vehicles could be fast, luxurious, and genuinely desirable. The Model X, for all its quirks, helped drag the premium SUV market into the electric age. Now, Tesla is preparing to turn the page on both of them—and not in favor of another car.

Instead, Elon Musk wants robots.

During a call with investors, Tesla’s CEO confirmed that production of the Model S and Model X will be wound down this year and effectively shut off, as the company prepares to convert its Fremont, California factory into a production hub for its Optimus humanoid robots. The move marks the end of Tesla’s longest-running vehicle lines and one of the clearest signs yet that Musk is steering the company away from being primarily a carmaker.

“It’s a little sad,” Musk admitted. But sentimentality has never been a strong force inside Tesla.

The Cars That Built Tesla

When the Model S launched in 2012, the idea of a long-range, high-performance electric luxury sedan bordered on fantasy. Gasoline still ruled, EVs were mostly compliance cars, and most of the auto industry assumed batteries were too expensive and too limiting to matter. Tesla didn’t just prove them wrong—it embarrassed them.

The Model S was quicker, cleaner, and more technologically ambitious than anything else in its class. It became a Silicon Valley status symbol, a drag-strip party trick, and a genuine disruptor all at once. Without it, Tesla would never have become the world’s most valuable automaker.

The Model X followed in 2015, bringing Tesla’s formula to the booming luxury SUV segment. Its falcon-wing doors and complicated hardware didn’t do it any favors in reliability rankings, but the X still found buyers who wanted an electric SUV long before the market was flooded with them.

Together, the S and X were Tesla’s proof of concept.

Now they’re being retired like aging race cars in a museum.

Why Tesla Is Walking Away

The decision comes as Tesla faces pressure on multiple fronts. Vehicle sales have softened over the past year, as competition from China and other global automakers intensifies and as some buyers recoil from Musk’s increasingly political public persona. Tesla even cut prices on the Model S and X in 2023 to stimulate demand—a quiet acknowledgment that their once-cutting-edge appeal had faded.

Meanwhile, Tesla’s latest financial results, while beating earnings expectations, showed total revenue down 3 percent year over year. Investors liked what they heard anyway, pushing the stock up about 2 percent after hours, likely because Musk continues to sell a future that has little to do with cars.

That future is robotaxis and humanoid robots.

Musk says Fremont will be retooled to build Optimus, Tesla’s still-theoretical line of humanoid robots. They don’t exist as consumer products yet, but Tesla is betting that machines that walk, lift, and work will eventually be more valuable than machines that drive.

A Brand at a Crossroads

For Tesla fans—and for car enthusiasts more broadly—this feels like a strange kind of farewell. The Model S, in particular, wasn’t just another luxury sedan. It changed how the world thought about electric cars. It forced Mercedes, BMW, and Porsche to respond. It made EV performance cool.

And now it’s being sacrificed not for another vehicle, but for a pivot into science fiction.

Tesla says it will continue to support existing Model S and Model X owners for as long as people drive them. But make no mistake: these cars are becoming orphans inside a company that no longer sees its future on four wheels.

Whether Musk’s bet on robots will pay off is still unknown. What is certain is that Tesla is walking away from the cars that made it famous, trading asphalt for algorithms and steering wheels for servo motors.

For an automaker that once promised to reinvent the car, that might be the most radical turn of all.

Source: Tesla