Tag Archives: vehicles

BMW’s Cheapest Race Car Is Still €98,000—But That’s a Bargain in Motorsport Land

By any normal-person metric, motorsport is a money pit. But in BMW M Motorsport’s universe, the new M2 Racing is practically a coupon. Based on the current G87-generation M2, it’s the Bavarians’ latest attempt to make customer racing just affordable enough that ambitious amateurs don’t have to sell both kidneys to go wheel-to-wheel.

This car replaces the old F87-based M2 CS Racing, and the philosophy is simple: less drama, less expense, same badge. That’s why the snarling 3.0-liter S58 straight-six from the road car is gone. In its place sits BMW’s familiar B48 2.0-liter turbo four, producing about 308 horsepower and 400 Nm of torque—numbers that sound modest until you remember that most entry-level race series cap power anyway. You’re paying to learn racecraft, not to set Nürburgring lap records.

At €98,000, the M2 Racing becomes the cheapest new BMW race car you can buy. In motorsport terms, that’s pocket change; in real life, that’s still “nice apartment in Sarajevo” money. But it’s a crucial first rung on BMW’s racing ladder. From here, drivers can graduate to the €219,000 M4 GT4 EVO, or if they’re feeling especially flush, the €578,000 M4 GT3 EVO. The ultimate M Hybrid V8? That one stays behind BMW’s velvet rope, factory drivers only—at least for now.

To make the M2 Racing more than just a track-day toy, BMW has launched the M2 Cup Iberia, a one-make championship folded into Spain and Portugal’s Supercars Endurance series. Ten races over five weekends, a €25,000 prize pool, and a grid full of identical cars means talent—not budget—does most of the talking. For a young or amateur driver, it’s as close to a level playing field as modern racing gets.

Of course, buying the car is only the opening move. BMW is refreshingly transparent about running costs, and the numbers are surprisingly sane by racing standards. The drivetrain—engine, gearbox, propshaft, differential, and driveshafts—costs about €1.50 per kilometer to run. Suspension and steering add another €2 per kilometer. That’s not small change, but it’s nowhere near the financial bloodbath of GT3 racing.

BMW also tells you exactly when things will break—or at least when they’re supposed to be replaced. The engine, gearbox, propshaft, and rear differential are good for 30,000 km. Front suspension arms last 20,000 km, driveshafts and rear arms 15,000 km, and dampers about 10,000 km. This isn’t guesswork; it’s motorsport on a service schedule.

Like any BMW, the €98,000 sticker is just the start. Want a rear wing? Air jacks? Data logging? Endless brake pads? A passenger seat for instructor laps? Open your wallet. The options list is long, and BMW knows exactly how to make a “cheap” race car quietly get more expensive.

Still, the genius of the M2 Racing is that it doesn’t pretend to be something it isn’t. The four-cylinder B48 is cheaper, lighter, and easier on consumables than the six-cylinder S58 would ever be in this environment. And since series regulations would just choke the bigger engine anyway, you’d be burning money for noise and bragging rights.

For someone with real racing ambitions, the M2 Racing is a gateway drug. Learn the craft here, prove you’re quick, and then move up to the M4 GT4. BMW has built a ladder that starts lower than ever before—and for once, it looks like you don’t have to fall into financial ruin just to climb the first rung.

Source: BMW

MINI Is Prepping a More Rugged Countryman for the Great Outdoors

For most of its life, the MINI Countryman has played the role of urban adventurer: all the rugged styling cues, none of the muddy consequences. But that may finally be about to change.

The current third-generation Countryman—known internally as the U25—is still a fresh face, yet MINI already seems eager to push it into new territory. With production expected to stretch into the early 2030s, the crossover’s runway is long enough for some genuinely interesting variations. And now we know at least one of those variations will try harder to live up to the “country” part of its name.

MINI has already dipped a toe into the outdoorsy waters with the Countryman Rugged Edition in South Africa. It’s a mostly cosmetic exercise, featuring chunkier General Grabber AT3 all-terrain tires and a few visual upgrades, but underneath it’s still the same soft-roading crossover. The real news came not from the spec sheet but from the design studio.

Speaking with Motor1, MINI design boss Holger Hampf all but confirmed that something more serious is in the pipeline. He pointed to a growing desire for “outdoor activity and independence—freedom that the car has always given us,” adding that we’ll “certainly see some of that in the next couple of years.” In MINI-speak, that sounds an awful lot like an off-road-leaning Countryman.

Don’t expect locking differentials and rock-crawling heroics. The Countryman is still a unibody crossover, not a ladder-frame bruiser, so it won’t be squaring up against a Jeep Wrangler anytime soon. But a factory-built “adventure” trim—complete with a raised suspension, protective cladding, standard all-wheel drive, and real all-terrain rubber—would go a long way toward making the Countryman more than just an REI catalog on wheels.

MINI has flirted with this idea before. The rally-inspired Countryman X-Raid and the Dakar-themed concepts proved that the shape and stance work surprisingly well when you lean into the rough-and-tumble aesthetic. The U25 platform could take that formula and finally make it showroom-ready.

And MINI isn’t alone in this push. Its parent company, BMW Group, is also gearing up for its most ambitious off-road move yet. A standalone three-row SUV, internally known as the “Rugged” project and codenamed G69, is slated for a 2029 debut and is reportedly aimed at heavy hitters like the Land Rover Defender and Mercedes-Benz G-Class. It won’t be quite that hardcore—but it should be more trail-capable than any BMW that’s come before it.

In other words, the BMW empire is discovering dirt. And if MINI’s upcoming Countryman variant is any indication, it plans to enjoy every muddy mile.

Source: Motor1

Renault’s Drone Deal Signals a New Era for Europe’s Auto Industry

For most of the past century, the European auto industry has been very good at one thing: building cars. But history has a way of bending manufacturing empires toward whatever the moment demands, and in 2025, that moment looks less like crossovers and EVs and more like geopolitics and unmanned aircraft.

Renault, a brand best known for hatchbacks, hot hatches, and the occasional Formula 1 title, has just agreed to build up to 600 military drones at its Le Mans facility in cooperation with French defense contractor Turgis Gaillard. It’s a move that sounds startling—until you remember that automakers have been pivoting into defense production for as long as there have been wars to fight.

Europe’s Auto Industry Is Looking for a Second Job

Europe is increasing defense spending at a pace not seen in decades. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine reset the continent’s threat perception, and even distant rumblings—like former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Greenland rhetoric—have reinforced the idea that Europe needs to be more militarily self-reliant.

France alone plans to boost its defense budget by €36.5 billion by 2030, according to President Emmanuel Macron’s recent address to the armed forces. That kind of money needs factories, suppliers, and engineers—and Europe just happens to have an enormous industrial base that’s increasingly underused as car production slows.

That’s where companies like Renault come in.

The Le Mans plant, which normally produces chassis components for Renault, Dacia, and other brands within the group, built 1.3 million parts in 2024 and employs about 1,500 people. In other words, it’s exactly the kind of high-volume, high-precision manufacturing environment defense contractors dream of but rarely own.

Now, some of that capacity will be diverted to drones.

This Isn’t Renault’s First War

If this feels like a dramatic shift for a modern car company, it really isn’t. Renault’s military résumé goes all the way back to World War I, when it built the Renault FT, one of the world’s first modern tanks. Even today, Renault Trucks—though no longer part of the Renault Group—produces armored vehicles for the French Army.

What’s different now is the product. Instead of tanks and troop carriers, Renault is helping build drones: small, software-heavy, electronics-intensive machines that are closer in spirit to a modern EV than to a Sherman tank.

And that’s exactly why automakers are being called in.

Why Carmakers Are Suddenly Attractive to Defense Ministries

Modern military hardware is increasingly defined by three things: electronics, software, and mass production. That’s the same trio that defines the automotive industry in the EV and autonomous-driving era.

Tesla may be the most famous example of a car company drifting toward robotics and AI, but Europe’s legacy manufacturers have quietly been developing similar skills: battery management, sensor fusion, embedded computing, and high-reliability manufacturing at scale.

From a defense perspective, Renault doesn’t need to become Lockheed Martin. It just needs to do what it already does best—designing, industrializing, and mass-producing complex machines—and apply that to a different kind of vehicle.

Renault Won’t Be Alone

Renault’s drone project is just the tip of a much larger pivot across Europe’s supplier base.

  • Valeo is already working with around 100 companies on defense-related drone systems.
  • Schaeffler is developing electronic components for Helsing drones.
  • Valmet is preparing to build armored vehicles.
  • ZF Friedrichshafen and Bosch are also involved, even if they’re not yet treating defense as a core business.

The logic is brutal but simple: European car production is in long-term decline, squeezed by Chinese competition, EV transition costs, and shrinking margins. Defense, meanwhile, is flush with cash and desperate for industrial capacity.

If you’re an automotive supplier staring at half-empty factories, military contracts suddenly look a lot like survival.

Not a Farewell to Cars—But a Hedge Against the Future

Renault insists this drone project won’t affect its car plans and that it has no intention of becoming a major defense contractor. That’s probably true. But it’s also beside the point.

This isn’t Renault abandoning the car business—it’s Renault buying insurance against a European auto market that looks increasingly fragile. If EVs don’t sell, if factories sit idle, if global competition keeps tightening, having another customer with a multi-billion-euro budget is very comforting.

A century ago, Renault helped France fight a war with tanks. Today, it will help with drones. Same company, same factories, different machines.

The badge on the hood still says Renault. The payload just changed.

Source: Renault; Photo: Turgis Gaillard