Tag Archives: ZEEKR

China Bans Turquoise Autonomous Driving Lights on New Cars

China has abruptly ended one of the most recognizable visual trends in its rapidly growing automotive industry. Authorities have ordered manufacturers to remove the turquoise exterior lights used to indicate that a vehicle is operating in autonomous driving mode, a decision that could reshape the future of self-driving vehicle signaling not only in China but globally.

The move marks another significant regulatory intervention by Beijing as it tightens oversight of advanced vehicle technologies. For Chinese automakers that have aggressively promoted autonomous driving features, the ban represents a notable setback at a time when they are already facing mounting scrutiny in international markets.

China Tightens Rules on Autonomous Driving Lights

According to Chinese industry reports, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has begun strict enforcement of the national vehicle lighting standard. The regulation permits only four colors for exterior vehicle lighting: white, red, yellow and orange. Blue, green and turquoise are not approved under the standard.

As a result, any new vehicle equipped with turquoise autonomous driving lights after August 1 will no longer receive sales approval in China, which means it cannot be registered for road use.

The decision effectively ends a short but highly visible chapter in Chinese automotive design.

From Li Auto L9 to Industry-Wide Trend

Turquoise autonomous driving lights first appeared in 2022 on the Li Auto L9, a flagship SUV that helped popularize the concept. The lighting served a simple purpose: informing surrounding road users that the vehicle was driving itself rather than being actively controlled by the driver.

Within a few years, the feature spread across multiple Chinese brands and became increasingly common on urban roads. The distinctive turquoise glow evolved into an unofficial symbol of China’s push toward intelligent mobility and advanced driver assistance systems.

Although the lights were never formally included in a national standard, regulators had previously tolerated their use in production vehicles.

Why Chinese Authorities Are Cracking Down

Officials have not publicly presented accident data linking turquoise lights to safety incidents, but critics argue that additional exterior signals could confuse other road users and create uncertainty in traffic.

A particularly sensitive issue is color recognition. In China, blue lighting is reserved for emergency vehicles such as police cars and ambulances. Regulators appear concerned that turquoise could be mistaken for blue under certain lighting conditions or at a distance.

The crackdown on autonomous driving lights is part of a broader campaign targeting vehicle features that authorities consider potentially risky or controversial. Recent regulatory actions have also addressed battery safety standards, fully retractable door handles and the use of full regenerative braking as the default setting in electrified vehicles.

Automakers Move Quickly to Comply

Chinese manufacturers have responded swiftly. Geely has already confirmed that it will fully comply with the new requirements, and other automakers are expected to follow.

The more complicated question concerns vehicles already on the road. Several manufacturers have demonstrated that the turquoise lighting function can be disabled through software. The Zeekr 9X, for example, can deactivate the autonomous mode lighting feature, making over-the-air updates a likely solution for existing owners.

Industry analysts expect many brands to remove the function entirely rather than maintain a dormant feature that could attract regulatory attention.

China Reverses Course on Earlier Autonomous Driving Proposal

Ironically, China once considered moving in the opposite direction. In 2021, regulators evaluated a proposal to make turquoise lighting a standardized indicator for vehicles with Level 3 autonomy and above. That proposal was ultimately excluded from the national standard, and the latest enforcement action confirms that authorities have decisively rejected the idea.

The reversal highlights how quickly regulatory priorities can change in the autonomous vehicle sector.

What the Ban Means for Global Self-Driving Standards

The implications extend well beyond China. In Europe and North America, turquoise has increasingly been viewed as a leading candidate for a future international standard identifying autonomous vehicles.

Western automakers have spent years studying how autonomous vehicles should communicate their operating status to pedestrians, cyclists and other drivers. Turquoise consistently emerged as a strong candidate because it is visually distinct from existing automotive lighting colors.

China’s decision therefore complicates efforts to establish a harmonized global signaling system for self-driving vehicles. If the world’s largest automotive market rejects turquoise while Western regulators continue to support it, manufacturers may eventually need region-specific lighting solutions.

Why Turquoise Was Chosen in the First Place

The original choice of turquoise was not merely a styling exercise. Researchers selected the color after extensive psychological studies and visibility testing.

Modern traffic already assigns specific meanings to most lighting colors: white and amber are associated with front lighting and signaling, red identifies the rear of a vehicle, and blue is reserved for emergency services in many countries. Turquoise offered strong contrast against common road environments, high visibility to the human eye and clear differentiation from established automotive signals.

Those advantages explain why many engineers continue to regard turquoise as one of the most practical colors for autonomous vehicle communication.

A Turning Point for China’s Intelligent Car Industry

China’s ban on turquoise autonomous driving lights may appear minor compared with battery regulations or autonomous driving software rules, but symbolically it is significant. The country has effectively removed a visual cue that had become synonymous with its intelligent vehicle ambitions.

For automotive enthusiasts, the change means future Chinese cars will lose one of their most distinctive design elements. For the industry, it is a reminder that regulatory approval can be as important as technological innovation in the race toward autonomous mobility.

Most importantly, the decision exposes a growing divide between China and Western markets over how self-driving vehicles should identify themselves in traffic. Whether that divide eventually leads to competing global standards could become one of the next major battlegrounds in the autonomous vehicle industry.

Source: Yicai

Zeekr 7GT: Sleek Chinese EV Estate Eyes Europe with Aggressive Pricing

Zeekr, the Geely-owned electric brand, is making its European ambitions clear with the launch of the 7GT, a sleek, high-tech estate designed to challenge established EVs like the Volkswagen ID.7 and Hyundai Ioniq 6. Officially unveiled today at the Brussels Motor Show, the 7GT will eventually make its way to the UK later this year.

Originally revealed in China last year as the 007 GT, the 7GT wears its European intentions on its sleeve. Measuring 4,817 mm long, 2,070 mm wide, and 1,456 mm tall, it offers a commanding presence on the road. Yet Zeekr undercuts its rivals aggressively: prices start at €45,990 (£40,000) and peak at €57,490 (£50,000), a fraction of the cost of comparable German and Korean EV estates.

The car is built in Hangzhou, China, but designed in Europe with European roads in mind, says Zeekr, highlighting the brand’s focus on styling and driving dynamics. Underpinning the 7GT is Geely’s PMA2+ platform, and buyers can choose from three configurations: Core rear-wheel drive, Long Range rear-wheel drive, and Privilege all-wheel drive.

Power comes from either a 75-kWh or 100-kWh battery pack, delivering a claimed range of up to 413 miles on the WLTP cycle. An 800-volt electrical architecture allows blistering charging speeds, with a compatible charger topping the battery from 10% to 80% in just 13 minutes. The range-topping AWD model produces 637 bhp, hitting 62 mph in a mere 3.3 seconds, though top speed is electronically limited to 130 mph.

Inside, the 7GT blends technology with minimalism. A 16-inch infotainment screen dominates the center stack, flanked by a 13-inch digital instrument cluster and a sprawling 35-inch head-up display. Despite its sleek profile, the estate offers 456 liters of luggage space—enough for weekend getaways or the occasional IKEA run.

While exact UK arrival dates are pending, Zeekr expects the 7GT to land in late summer, marking the next step in its European offensive. With competitive pricing, cutting-edge tech, and European-focused engineering, the 7GT could be a compelling alternative for buyers looking beyond traditional EV brands.

Source: Zeekr

Geely Signals Serious U.S. Intentions for Its Premium Brands

The United States remains the automotive world’s most tempting prize—and one of its most difficult. For Geely Holding Group, the sprawling Chinese conglomerate that already owns Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus, the next act may finally involve putting its own newer brands on American roads. If the plan comes together, Zeekr and Lynk & Co could be built and sold in the U.S. before the end of the decade.

That’s the message coming from Geely insiders, who are now openly discussing America not as a hypothetical but as a question of timing and execution. And crucially, Geely may already have the infrastructure to pull it off without tripping over tariffs: Volvo’s factory in South Carolina.

Speaking with Autoline, Ash Sutcliffe, Geely Holding Group’s head of global communications, made it clear that the U.S. is very much on the company’s strategic radar—even if no firm commitments have been signed in ink yet.

“Right now, we’re looking at all global markets where we can expand,” Sutcliffe said. “We’re currently very strong in China. We’re developing strong in Southeast Asia. Europe is very stable. But the big question for us is when and where will we go to the USA?”

That hesitation isn’t surprising. The U.S. market has become increasingly hostile territory for Chinese-built vehicles, thanks to steep tariffs, political scrutiny, and tightening regulations. But Geely’s ownership of Volvo gives it a potential workaround: local production. Building vehicles in South Carolina would allow Geely to sidestep import penalties while presenting its products as “American-built,” at least in the regulatory sense.

Sutcliffe pointed specifically to Zeekr and Lynk & Co as brands that could resonate stateside. Both sit above mass-market offerings, aiming squarely at the premium space—an area where American buyers have shown a growing appetite, particularly for tech-heavy electrified vehicles.

And that appetite matters. While Geely declined to lock in a production timeline, Sutcliffe suggested that clarity may not be far off. An official announcement, he said, could arrive within the next two to three years.

That window aligns neatly with broader industry shifts. By the late 2020s, EV adoption in the U.S. is expected to be deeper, charging infrastructure more mature, and consumers more comfortable with brands that didn’t exist on American soil a decade earlier. Tesla cracked that psychological barrier. Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis blew it wide open. The door isn’t closed—it’s just guarded.

“From what we’re seeing so far, there’s strong demand for affordable, premium, and luxury vehicles,” Sutcliffe said. “So I think we’re in a good place to offer the American consumer something very different.”

“Different” is doing a lot of work there. Zeekr, for example, leans heavily into minimalist design, high-end materials, and aggressive electrification—think Scandinavian restraint with Chinese tech ambition. Lynk & Co plays a slightly funkier card, blending youthful styling with subscription-friendly ownership concepts that could either feel refreshing or confusing in a market still wedded to traditional buying habits.

Still, Geely isn’t coming in cold. Volvo has spent years rebuilding trust and prestige in the U.S., while Polestar has already tested American waters with mixed—but instructive—results. If Geely applies those lessons, Zeekr and Lynk & Co could arrive better prepared than most newcomers.

For now, everything remains conditional. No production lines have been assigned, no dealer networks announced, and no vehicles confirmed. But for the first time, Geely isn’t asking if it should come to America—it’s asking how.

And in today’s auto industry, that shift alone is worth paying attention to.

Source: Autoline